The ultimate guide to English tests for business: Everything HR professionals need to know

Samantha Ball
A group of business people sat on a sofa together
Reading time: 8 minutes

No matter what industry you work in, effective communication is key. For many companies, this means ensuring their employees have strong English language skills. As an HR professional, you have the power to play a pivotal role in this process. English tests can be invaluable tools for improving hiring processes, assessing communication skills, and enhancing overall team productivity. This guide will provide you with everything you need to know about using English tests in your business.

For more guidance on hiring with confidence, also take a look at our simpleÌýguide to language skill assessment.

Part 1: Understanding English tests

Types of business English tests commonly used in business

When it comes to English tests, there are several types commonly used in the corporate world:

  • General proficiency tests: These assess overall English skills, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Examples include the TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication), PTE (ɫèAV Test of English) and IELTS (International English Language Testing System).
  • Business English tests: These focus specifically on business-related language skills. Versant by ɫèAV and the BEC (Business English Certificate) are some main examples.
  • Skills-specific tests: These assessments evaluate specific skills, such as writing or speaking, in a business setting. Proficiency in English vocabulary is particularly important in these tests, especially for business English. It involves understanding and using business-specific terminology effectively and measures proficiency across listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills on the GSE or CEFR scale.

How these tests are designed and scored

English tests are usually created by language experts and psychometricians to ensure their reliability and validity. These tests include different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, essays, and spoken responses. Objective questions can be scored by a computer, while essays and spoken responses are typically graded by trained examiners.

Differences between various English proficiency tests

Each English proficiency test has its unique characteristics. For instance, the TOEIC focuses on everyday workplace language, making it better suited for general office environments. On the other hand, the BEC is tailored for more specific business interactions, such as negotiations and presentations. Versant by ɫèAV tests offer a distinctive approach to assessing English proficiency with a focus on communication skills that are critical in a business context. Unlike traditional tests, Versant by ɫèAV assessments assess various aspects of speech, such as pronunciation, fluency, vocabulary, and syntax for a more rounded overview. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right test for your needs.

Part 2: Benefits of English tests for businesses

Improving candidate selection processes

English tests play an important role in identifying candidates best qualified for the job, significantly enhancing your hiring process. '' by Randall L. Jones and Bernard Spolsky emphasize the importance of improving candidate selection processes through effective English proficiency tests.

The papers highlight the critical role of assessing speaking, listening, and reading skills to ensure accurate measurement of job-related language abilities. Various methods, such as oral interviews, listening comprehension tests, and contextual reading assessments, are discussed for their validity and effectiveness in evaluating communicative competence. By enhancing these testing techniques, organizations can make more informed and objective hiring decisions, ultimately leading to better job performance and reduced turnover.Ìý

Reducing employee turnover

Properly designed selection processes that incorporate English tests can also help in reducing employee turnover. When you assess language skills effectively, you are more likely to hire candidates who fit well with the job requirements and the company culture. (2009) underscores this point. 'Hiring for retention and performance' reveals that thorough selection processes can significantly decrease employee turnover. By employing these comprehensive assessments, businesses can save on the high costs associated with recruitment and training, while fostering a more stable and cohesive workforce.

Enhancing candidate experience and perception

Incorporating English tests into your hiring process not only helps in selecting the right candidates but also contributes to a fair and transparent selection procedure. Applicants often have better experiences and perceptions of the selection process when they feel the testing procedures are just and clear.

According to an analysis by Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004), fair and transparent testing procedures can greatly improve candidate reactions. found that when candidates perceive the selection process as equitable, they are more likely to view the organization positively, regardless of the outcome. This can enhance your company’s reputation and attract high-quality candidates in the future.

Assessing communication skills for specific job roles

Different job roles require different levels of English proficiency. For example, a customer service representative might need strong speaking and listening skills, while a technical writer would need excellent writing abilities. English tests allow you to assess these specific skills, ensuring you hire the best fit for each role.

Enhancing team dynamics and productivity

Language barriers can hinder team collaboration and efficiency. By ensuring all employees have a solid command of English, you can improve communication, reduce misunderstandings, and boost overall productivity.Ìý

Part 3: Implementing English tests in the hiring process

Best practices for integrating English tests into recruitment

To effectively integrate English tests into your recruitment process, follow these best practices:

  1. Identify key language skills: Determine which English skills are most important for each job role.
  2. Choose the right test: Select a test that accurately assesses these skills.
  3. Train your team: Ensure your HR team is trained to administer and interpret the tests.
  4. Provide feedback and utilize task management: Offer candidates constructive feedback based on their test results and incorporate task management to streamline the workflow, making the hiring process faster and more efficient.

Additionally, using recruitment tools like Versant by ɫèAV can significantly simplify the recruitment process, broadening your network of potential candidates and ensuring a more productive, cost-effective, and unbiased hiring process.

Legal and ethical considerations

It's important to be aware of legal and ethical considerations when implementing English tests. Ensure that your tests are fair and non-discriminatory. Provide reasonable accommodations for candidates with disabilities and be transparent about how the test results will be used in the hiring process.

Tools and platforms for administering tests

There are several tools and platforms available for administering English tests. Some popular options include:

  • Online testing platforms: These offer flexibility and convenience. Like Versant by ɫèAV testing solutions.
  • In-house testing solutions: These can be customized to your specific needs.
  • Third-party providers: Companies like ɫèAV offer comprehensive testing services.

Video interviewing has become an indispensable tool in the candidate assessment process. Recruiters can conduct both live and pre-recorded interviews, which integrate seamlessly with applicant tracking systems. This technology overcomes geographical and timezone limitations, speeds up the screening process, and leverages AI-powered features for enhanced decision-making.

Conclusion

Incorporating English tests into your hiring process can offer numerous benefits, from improving candidate selection to boosting team productivity. As the market for English assessment in the business sector continues to grow, staying ahead of the curve can give your company a competitive advantage.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to refine your current approach, now is the perfect time to consider integrating English tests into your recruitment strategy. Enhance your recruitment process with English tests and take your business to new heights. Incorporating these assessments is crucial for making informed talent management decisions, especially in evaluating job applicants and identifying qualified candidates for promotion.

For more insights and resources on improving your hiring processes, connect with us today and discover how we can support you on this journey.

Frequently asked questions

More blogs from ɫèAV

  • A group of students stood around a teacher on a laptop

    The ethical challenges of AI in education

    By Billie Jago
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    AI is revolutionising every industry, and language learning is no exception. AI tools can provide students with unprecedented access to things like real-time feedback, instant translation and AI-generated texts, to name but a few.

    AI can be highly beneficial to language education by enhancing our students’ process of learning, rather than simply being used by students to ‘demonstrate’ a product of learning. However, this is easier said than done, and given that AI is an innovative tool in the classroom, it is crucial that educators help students to maintain authenticity in their work and prevent AI-assisted ‘cheating’. With this in mind, striking a balance between AI integration and academic integrity is critical.

    How AI impacts language learning

    Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini have made it easier than ever for students to refine and develop their writing. However, these tools also raise concerns about whether submitted texts are student-produced, and if so, to what extent. If students rely on text generation tools instead of their own skills, our understanding of our students’ abilities may not reflect their true proficiency.

    Another issue is that if students continue to use AI for a skill they are capable of doing on their own, they’re likely to eventually lose that skill or become significantly worse at it.

    These points create a significant ethical dilemma:

    • How does AI support learning, or does it (have the potential to) replace the learning process?
    • How can educators differentiate between genuine student ability and AI-assisted responses?

    AI-integration strategies

    There are many ways in which educators can integrate AI responsibly, while encouraging our learners to do so too.

    1.ÌýRedesign tasks to make them more ‘AI-resistant’

    No task can be completely ‘AI-resistant’, but there are ways in which teachers can adapt coursebook tasks or take inspiration from activities in order to make them less susceptible to being completed using AI.

    For example:

    • Adapt writing tasks to be hyperlocal or context-specific. Generative AI is less likely to be able to generate texts that are context-bound. Focus on local issues and developments, as well as school or classroom-related topics. A great example is having students write a report on current facilities in their classroom and suggestions for improving the learning environment.
    • Focus on the process of writing rather than the final product. Have students use mind maps to make plans for their writing, have them highlight notes from this that they use in their text and then reflect on the steps they took once they’ve written their piece.
    • Use multimodal learning. Begin a writing task with a class survey, debate or discussion, then have students write up their findings into a report, essay, article or other task type.
    • Design tasks with skill-building at the core. Have students use their critical thinking skills to analyse what AI produces, creatively adapt its output and problem solve by fact-checking AI-generated text.

    2.ÌýUse AI so that students understand you know how to use it

    Depending on the policies in your institution, if you can use AI in the classroom with your students, they will see that you know about different AI tools and their output. A useful idea is to generate a text as a class, and have students critically analyse the AI-generated text. What do they think was done well? What could be improved? What would they have done differently?

    You can also discuss the ethical implications of AI in education (and other industries) with your students, to understand their view on it and better see in what situations they might see AI as a help or a hindrance.

    3.ÌýUse the GSE Learning Objectives to build confidence in language abilities

    Sometimes, students might turn to AI if they don’t know where to start with a task or lack confidence in their language abilities. With this in mind, it’s important to help your students understand where their language abilities are and what they’re working towards, with tangible evidence of learning. This is where the GSE Learning Objectives can help.

    The Global Scale of English (GSE) provides detailed, skill-specific objectives at every proficiency level, from 10 to 90. These can be used to break down complex skills into achievable steps, allowing students to see exactly what they need to do to improve their language abilities at a granular level.

    • Start by sharing the GSE Learning Objectives with students at the start of class to ensure they know what the expectations and language goals are for the lesson. At the end of the lesson, you can then have students reflect on their learning and find evidence of their achievement through their in-class work and what they’ve produced or demonstrated.
    • Set short-term GSE Learning Objectives for the four key skills – speaking, listening, reading and writing. That way, students will know what they’re working towards and have a clear idea of their language progression.
  • A teacher stood by a long wooden desk where her students are sat smiling at her

    What’s it like to teach English in France?

    By Steffanie Zazulak
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    Kirsty Murray taught English for a year at a collège (the French equivalent of a secondary school) in Villers-Cotterêts: a town in the north of France known for being the birthplace of Alexandre Dumas. She taught mixed-ability groups of 11- to 16-year-olds, with classes ranging in size from 10 to 35 students. Here, she shares the five lessons she learned from the experience.

  • A teacher helping a teenage student working at her desk in a library

    How teachers can use the GSE for professional development

    By Fajarudin Akbar
    Reading time: 4.5 minutes

    As English teachers, we’re usually the ones helping others grow. We guide learners through challenges, celebrate their progress and push them to reach new heights. But what about our own growth? How do we, as educators, continue to develop and refine our practice?

    The Global Scale of English (GSE) is often seen as a tool for assessing students. However, in my experience, it can also be a powerful guide for teachers who want to become more intentional, reflective, and confident in their teaching. Here's how the GSE has helped me in my own journey as an English teacher and how it can support yours too.

    About the GSE

    The GSE is a proficiency scale developed by ɫèAV. It measures English ability across four skills – listening, speaking, reading and writing – on a scale from 10 to 90. It’s aligned with the CEFR but offers more detailed learning objectives, which can be incredibly useful in diverse teaching contexts.

    I first encountered the GSE while exploring ways to better personalize learning objectives in my Business English classes. As a teacher in a non-formal education setting in Indonesia, I often work with students who don’t fit neatly into one CEFR level. I needed something more precise, more flexible, and more connected to real classroom practice. That’s when the GSE became a turning point.

    Reflecting on our teaching practice

    The GSE helped me pause and reflect. I started reading through the learning objectives and asking myself important questions. Were my lessons really aligned with what learners at this level needed? Was I challenging them just enough or too much?

    By using the GSE as a mirror, I began to see areas where I could improve. For example, I realized that, although I was confident teaching speaking skills, I wasn’t always giving enough attention to writing development. The GSE didn’t judge me. It simply showed me where I could grow.

    Planning with purpose

    One of the best things about the GSE is that it brings clarity to lesson planning. Instead of guessing whether an activity is suitable for a student’s level, I now check the GSE objectives. If I know a learner is at GSE 50 in speaking, I can design a role-play that matches that level of complexity. If another learner is at GSE 60, I can challenge them with more open-ended tasks.

    Planning becomes easier and more purposeful. I don’t just create lessons, I design learning experiences that truly meet students where they are.

    Collaborating with other teachers

    The GSE has also become a shared language for collaboration. When I run workshops or peer mentoring sessions, I often invite teachers to explore the GSE Toolkit together. We look at learning objectives, discuss how they apply to our learners, and brainstorm ways to adapt materials.

    These sessions are not just about theory: they’re energizing. Teachers leave with new ideas, renewed motivation and a clearer sense of how to bring their teaching to the next level.

    Getting started with the GSE

    If you’re curious about how to start using the GSE for your own growth, here are a few simple steps:

    • Visit the GSE Teacher Toolkit and explore the learning objectives for the skills and levels you teach.
    • Choose one or two objectives that resonate with you and reflect on whether your current lessons address them.
    • Try adapting a familiar activity to better align with a specific GSE range.
    • Use the GSE when planning peer observations or professional learning communities. It gives your discussions a clear focus.

    Case study from my classroom

    I once had a private Business English student preparing for a job interview. Her speaking skills were solid – around GSE 55 – but her writing was more limited, probably around GSE 45. Instead of giving her the same tasks across both skills, I personalized the lesson.

    For speaking, we practiced mock interviews using complex questions. For writing, I supported her with guided sentence frames for email writing. By targeting her actual levels, not just a general CEFR level, she improved faster and felt more confident.

    That experience reminded me that when we teach with clarity, learners respond with progress.

    Challenges and solutions

    Of course, using the GSE can feel overwhelming at first. There are many descriptors, and it can take time to get familiar with the scale. My advice is to start small: focus on one skill or one level. Also, use the Toolkit as a companion, not a checklist.

    Another challenge is integrating the GSE into existing materials, and this is where technology can help. I often use AI tools like ChatGPT to adjust or rewrite tasks so they better match specific GSE levels. This saves time and makes differentiation easier.

    Teachers deserve development too

    Teaching is a lifelong journey. The GSE doesn’t just support our students, it also supports us. It helps us reflect, plan, and collaborate more meaningfully. Most of all, it reminds us that our growth as teachers is just as important as the progress of our learners.

    If you’re looking for a simple, practical, and inspiring way to guide your professional development, give the GSE a try. It helped me grow, and I believe it can help you too.

    Additional resources