12 tips for training older teachers in technology

ɫèAV Languages
Older Woman with glasses sitting at a laptop

An assumption persists in the educational community that more mature teachers are much more difficult and reluctant to be trained on the effective use of educational technology. To some degree, I think this assumption has been built on by the digital native vs digital immigrant myth. But as someone who has trained teachers of all ages all over the world, I would say that, from my own experience, this hasn¡¯t been the case.

What I have found to be the case is that more mature teachers are:

  • less likely to be lured by the shiny hardware and the seemingly wonderful claims made to go along with it.
  • more critical and skeptical about the way technology is used in the classroom.
  • less confident when using various apps and websites and less likely to explore the different features.
  • more easily discouraged by failures.
  • less familiar with various tools, applications and services that have become part of everyday life for younger users.
  • more likely to be able to see through ¡°technology for technology¡¯s sake¡± classroom applications.

So how should trainers approach the challenges of working with these teachers? Here are a few tips from my own experience of training older teachers to use technology.

Be sure of your ground pedagogically

So many edtech trainers are great with technology, but much less versed in educational theory and pedagogy. More mature teachers are more likely to have a more robust theoretical understanding, so be prepared to back up your ideas with sound pedagogical insights and try to relate your training back to theories of learning and pedagogical approaches.?

Make sure training is hands-on

Running through a list of tools and ideas in a presentation may have some value, but it doesn¡¯t come anywhere close to the impact of giving teachers hands-on experience and the chance to actually work with the tech to create something.?

Give solid examples of what you have done

Being able to speak from experience about how you have used tech with your own students will have far more impact than theoretical applications of ¡°You could do blah blah blah with your students.¡± Sharing anecdotes of how you have used technology in your classes, the challenges you have faced and how you have overcome or even been overcome by them can really lend credibility to your training.?

Manage expectations

A positive attitude is great, but be also prepared to point out weaknesses, and potential pitfalls and talk about your own failures. This might help your trainees avoid the same mistakes and stop them from becoming disillusioned.?

Make time to experiment and explore

Don¡¯t be tempted to cram in as many tools, techniques and activities as possible. Incorporate project time into your training so that teachers have the chance to go away and explore the things that interest them most and get their own perspective on how they can use them with students.?

Back up technical training

Learning to use new tools is getting easier all the time, especially on mobile, but it¡¯s still relatively easy for teachers to forget which button to press or which link to follow. So back up any demonstrations with an illustrated step-by-step guide or a video tutorial that teachers can return to later.?

Make their lives easier

Using technologies that can make what they already do a bit easier or a bit quicker is a great way to start. For example, I have a link to a tool that really quickly creates a?. Sharing tools like this that start from what teachers already do can really help to get them on your side.?

Do things that can¡¯t be done

One of the most common remarks made by more mature teachers about technology is: ¡°Well, that¡¯s fine, but you can do that without tech by ¡­¡± If you can show examples of technology use that go beyond what is already possible in the classroom, then you are much more likely to get capture their enthusiasm.?One example of this is the use of collaborative writing tools like??and its ability to track, record and show how students constructed text.

Solve classroom problems

Being able to spot a genuine classroom problem and show how technology can solve it can be very persuasive. One example of this is gist reading which can be very challenging to teach because students tend to ignore time limits. Cue Prompters?can give teachers control of the text and push students to gist read at the speed the teacher chooses. Problem solved.?

Plan with long-term and short-term goals

However inspiring your training session is, and however short or long it is, you should ensure that teachers leave it with a plan.??are great if you have time to work on them with the teachers. If you don¡¯t have time to get them to create individual SMART plans, at least get them to think about the first step or the first technology application they will try in their classroom and what they will do with it.?

Tech can be implemented in CPD

One of the reasons many mature teachers feel less confident with tech is because they often only use it in the classroom. Showing how technology can become part of their own self-guided CPD and professional practice, and helping them to build their PLN can energize their technology use and make their development much more autonomous and long-lasting.?

Make sure everything works

I can¡¯t emphasize this enough. Make sure you have updated all your plugins, browser versions, etc., and check the network and connectivity and make sure everything runs smoothly. Nothing puts teachers off more quickly than seeing the trainer fail.

Having read this list of tips you are likely to think: ¡°But all technology training should be like that!¡± Yes, you are right it should, but the truth is we are more likely to be able to get away with lower standards when working with teachers who are already more enthusiastic about tech. So the next time you walk into a training room and see some older teachers there, don¡¯t groan with disappointment, but welcome the opportunity to test your skills and understanding with the most critical audience. If you can send them away motivated to use technology, then you know you are on the right track.?

More blogs from ɫèAV

  • Mike Mayor and Yukio Tono

    Japan¡¯s English education evolves with international standards: How CEFR-J and GSE support learning

    By Mike Mayor
    Reading time: 7 minutes

    As economies around the world deal with the impact of AI on the workplace, the role of English is, if anything, gaining in importance. It has long been the?lingua franca?of international business but as AI starts to replace some of the more routine jobs at work, and AI translation is able to deal with some of the more transactional tasks, employers are looking more and more at recruiting employees with the soft or human skills that AI cannot currently replace. Skills such as communication, collaboration and leadership. English is no longer simply an entry requirement for a university education. It is the key to achieving many of life¡¯s goals.?

    Given the importance of English for cross-border communication, it is vital that learners are guided by internationally-recognized standards. Standards such as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the Global Scale of English (GSE). We sat down with Yukio Tono, professor at the Graduate School of Global Studies at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies and promoter of the CEFR in Japan, and Mike Mayor, Senior Director of the Global Scale of English at ɫèAV, to discuss the relevance of these two frameworks for English language education in Japan.??

  • A number of students sat at computers in a library

    What's the most effective way to learn English?

    By Mike Mayor

    "What¡¯s the most effective way to learn English?" It¡¯s a question that has perplexed linguists for years. I see room for plenty of innovation in where it all starts - 'Ed'.

    The evolution of edtech

    In the seventies, reel to reel tape recorders were the latest technology. They enabled us school kids in the north of England to hear French sentences spoken by a first language speaker, rather than by an English teacher.

    We looked at pictures projected onto the wall, listened to the sentences and repeated them over and over again.?Not only did the audio-lingual methodology use the latest technology ¨C but the pedagogy was also based on the 'sound' learning science of behaviorism. In a nutshell: if you repeat something often enough, it becomes automatic.

    This 'drill and kill' approach to language learning has since been discredited and replaced by the communicative approach. Nevertheless, it lasted long enough to inform all of my secondary school French education.

    I was considered a linguist and a grade A student. I went on to study for a French degree. But when I finally landed in France, I was unable to participate in even the most basic conversations. How effective had my language learning been?

    A focus on outcomes is needed

    So what is the takeaway? Publishers, entrepreneurs and edtech companies must think carefully about their products and courses. What problems are they trying to address? What outcomes are they trying to target?

    It¡¯s not enough to be innovative or novel. The shiny new toy will only engage learners for a short time if they don¡¯t feel like they are making progress. We need to measure the impact on actual learning.

    However, it is great to see so many exciting things happening in the world of edtech. For the first time, I believe we are on the cusp of delivering truly personalized learning journeys to all students ¨Cnot just those who can afford individual tuition.

    Many of us are developing AI that makes the learning journey adaptive, that monitors learner progress and surfaces that progress to the learner, that offers feedback on pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, speaking and writing.

    We know that feedback has a significant impact on learning. We also know that it is challenging to give feedback on spontaneous language. But this is where AI is heading and soon the vision of learners interacting with virtual tutors on various topics will be a reality.

    The role of teachers in the edtech landscape

    Will technology replace teachers? Unlikely. Language is a social construct. We learn languages to communicate with others ¨C and an increasing number of language apps are partnering with online tutors and creating language communities to address this need for human interaction. But technology can supplement what the teacher does ¨C and will be able to do so more meaningfully thanks to AI.

    It can extend language learning outside of the classroom, driving faster progress. It is available 24/7.It provides learners with a safe space to practice and fail ¨C a way to build confidence. It does not replace the teacher. Instead, it enables the teacher to be replaced in the classroom, focusing on the communicative elements of language learning that are still a challenge for apps.

  • A young man sat in a library, he has a pen in hand and is looking at the camera; a stack of books are next to him

    What does it mean to be fluent in English?

    By Mike Mayor

    What do we mean by English fluency, and how can understanding competencies across the four skills provide a more realistic picture of communicative English ability?

    What is fluency?

    As someone who worked in dictionaries, the meaning of words has always interested me ¨C and fluency is a particular case in point. Language learners often set themselves the goal of becoming fluent in a language. Job adverts often specify ¡°fluent in English or Spanish¡± as a requirement. But what does being 'fluent' in a language actually mean? If we look in the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, we see that fluent means ¡°able to speak a language very well¡±. Fluent speech or writing is described as ¡°smooth and confident, with no mistakes¡±. In general, fluency is most often associated with spoken language ¨C but is that the goal of all language learners? And what does being able to speak fluently show about the other language skills?

    Describing English proficiency

    Before entering the world of dictionaries, I taught English as a foreign language in France. At that time, the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) had not yet been published and learners were described in very general terms ¨C beginner, intermediate, advanced ¨C with no agreed standards on what learners at each level were expected to know. As well as establishing standards, the CEFR also shifted the focus of language assessment from knowledge of grammar and vocabulary to functional competence, i.e. what can a student actually do with the language they¡¯re learning across the four skills:

    • listening
    • reading?
    • speaking
    • writing

    Interestingly, while calling out specific objectives for each skill, almost two-thirds of the information in the CEFR describes spoken language. This seems to imply that spoken fluency is indeed the most important goal for all language learners.

    Mapping out a personalized path to proficiency

    As a global publisher, ɫèAV English recognizes that all learners are different ¨C in their backgrounds, learning environments and learning goals. This is why we have undertaken new research to extend the set of learning objectives contained in the CEFR to account for learners who need detailed information about their level in all four skills, not just in one (typically, that of speaking).

    No learner will be equally proficient in all four language skills ¨C in the same way that no native speaker is equally proficient in all skills in their first language. Some of us are better at writing than speaking, and many are illiterate in their first language. A true measure of language proficiency needs to take into account all of the skills. Equally, not every learner of English will need to be 'fluent' in spoken communication.

    Many researchers need to read papers in English and attend conferences in English ¨C but will only ever present and write in their first language. Is 'fluency' a good way to describe their goal? And if it isn¡¯t, does that somehow diminish their language achievements? By acknowledging proficiency in individual skills ¨C rather than catch-all terms such as 'fluent' ¨C we gain a clearer understanding of goals and outcomes, and with this knowledge, we are in a better position to tailor learning to the individual.

    Interested in learning more about the English language? Check out our post?How using jargon, idioms and colloquialism confuses English learners and our post on strange English phrases.

    If you're looking to improve your own fluency (in any language) make sure to check out our language learning app Mondy.?