The impact of any learning material goes far beyond its subject matter and pedagogical objectives. Everything included, from the choice of language, to the imagery, to the text and front covers, has the potential to reinforce stereotypes unintentionally. This can shape a learner¡¯s sense of self and others around them and affect how they feel and behave in a social setting.
A wealth of evidence suggests that early gender bias influences future inequality. It can affect career aspirations, influence the choice of school subjects and ultimately contribute to gender disparity as children grow into adults.?This is a challenge for all sectors and industries across society. Guidelines have been developed for ɫèAV to ensure that our materials are gender equal and showcase positive female role models.
The guidelines are broken down into three different areas surrounding gender equality:
The guidelines help to ensure that women are represented equally to men in our learning and teaching materials. This includes ensuring that women's representation does not reinforce negative stereotypes. For example, content that shows women as single parents can also present them as single parents and workers. The idea is to .
Another common example is with regards to science materials.
Often, when students are asked to describe a famous scientist, they describe a character similar to Albert Einstein with white hair and a white coat. Female scientists are often overlooked in this respect, and historically, they have not been given as much attention as their male counterparts.
This type of unconscious bias is something the guidelines aim to help change. Our goal is to represent both women and men from various backgrounds across all subjects. For example, some content shows women in traditionally male roles, such as pilots, engineers and soldiers. The objective is to highlight that .
Another issue is the objectification of women. Often, women are presented as not having agency or purpose, and too much focus is placed on their appearance, rather than their intentions, behavior and aspirations. The new guidelines set out to change this.
Our language is gendered and therefore steeped in stereotyping. We aim to promote the use of terminology that is non-gendered. For example, using ¡®police officer¡¯, ¡®firefighter¡¯ and ¡®maintenance worker¡¯ instead of ¡®policeman¡¯, ¡®fireman¡¯ and ¡®handyman¡¯. Although this is a small change, it contributes to removing the unconscious bias surrounding jobs and professions.
Adjectives can also play a role in perpetuating gender inequality. We often associate particular adjectives with genders. For example, words like ¡®hysterical¡¯, ¡®shrill¡¯, or ¡®frumpy¡¯ are typically used for women. Whereas men can be described as ¡®assertive¡¯, women are more likely to be seen as ¡®bossy¡¯.
Furthermore, parallel language is something that needs to be looked at. Words like ¡®girls and boys¡¯ can be replaced with ¡®students¡¯. In this way, the guidelines are here to ensure that there is no gendering within materials. This will influence gender equality among our users.
Another key issue involved in the material is the referencing of third-party content. For example, stories based on classic fairy tales are often used to represent certain points, and these typically show the strong male hero saving the weak female damsel in distress.
Although these are stories that our society has grown up with, they could be more helpful in offering a gender-balanced view of society. ɫèAV¡¯s guidelines are in place to ensure that students see women and men as equals throughout the materials.
To help fight against gender inequality, teachers can think about incorporating more female stories and role models into their lessons. For example, rather than simply focusing on Issac Newton or Albert Einstein in science class.
At a management level, schools can be more aware of what materials they are choosing to bring in, assessing whether the content is balanced, before accepting it. These simple actions can help our learners grow up with a more balanced view of gender.
Whether you're hiring new talent or upskilling your current team, understanding the level of English proficiency required for specific roles is crucial. In today's global business environment, effective communication is key to success, and that's where the Global Scale of English (GSE) comes into play.
Staying ahead requires not just talent but the right talent. For HR professionals, ensuring that employees are equipped with the necessary skills is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. Enter the GSE Job Profiles¡ªa game-changing tool designed to facilitate role-targeted upskilling by mapping English language skills to specific job roles. This blog post will explore how HR teams can leverage this innovative tool to enhance workforce capabilities efficiently and effectively.
The GSE Job Profiles utilizes ɫèAV¡¯s Global Scale of English and the Faethm by ɫèAV skills ontology to provide a detailed analysis of the language requirements for nearly 1,400 job roles. This precise mapping allows HR professionals to make informed talent management decisions, including hiring, training and development, and ensuring that employees are adequately prepared for their roles now and in the future.
English is the international language of business and a foundational skill for many roles. The right level of English proficiency is key for individuals and businesses to excel.
But what is the ¡°right¡± level?
English is not a one-size-fits-all skill. Customer Service Representatives need different English skills to IT Systems Managers. Senior staff will often need more advanced English skills than junior staff.
