Choosing the right English test is like hiring the perfect tour guide
Imagine planning a trip to a new city. Sure, you could wander around on your own, relying on internet reviews and vague directions, or you could hire a tour guide... someone who knows the streets, understands the landmarks, and can give you a genuine and knowledge-filled experience.
Now, would you pick a tour guide who just started last week, or would you look to one who has been showing people around for decades, refining their approach and knowing all the ins and outs of the landscape?
That’s the difference experience makes.
Why experience in testing matters
Just like an expert guide ensures you experience the best parts of a city because they’ve explored every corner before, a test backed by years of research and constant refinement delivers reliable, accurate results for international admissions teams. ɫèAV has spent years perfecting its approach to language assessment, not only through research but also by learning from every test taken.
Each test provides valuable data, feeding into ongoing improvements, ensuring that assessments remain fair, precise, and aligned with real-world English proficiency needs.
The result? Universities can trust they’re admitting students based on a system that gets smarter with every exam, reducing unpredictability and reinforcing reliability.
English Tests designed by experts
Both PTE Academic and ɫèAV English Express Test benefit from ɫèAV’s expertise:
- PTE Academic: A globally trusted exam designed to measure real-world English proficiency with precision.
- ɫèAV English Express Test: Fast and convenient skills assessment, backed by the same deep research ensuring fairness and accuracy.
Final thought: Choose experience
When you pick the right guide who is backed with expertise, it can transform your experience from ordinary to unforgettable. Likewise, choosing a well-established proficiency test, refined through years of experience, gives universities the confidence to make informed admissions decisions.
ɫèAV has spent decades perfecting the science of language assessment—so why leave such a critical choice to uncertainty?