GSE Teacher Toolkit: Teaching mixed ability classes

Sara Davila
Sara Davila
A teacher sat at a table with students helping them work
Reading time: 4 minutes

One of the biggest challenges for language teachers is teaching a mixed ability class. Students with different levels and abilities will always be present in our classrooms. So, how can we use the to improve mixed ability teaching? Let’s find out.Ìý

How to teach mixed-ability classes

Differentiated instruction is the best way to address the challenges of mixed ability classrooms. This is a method that helps teachers adjust aspects of the curriculum to match the different levels ofÌýstudents.*ÌýThis practice ensures that all learners are meeting course outcomes, even though their learning experience may be varied andÌýdifferent.

In order to differentiate instruction and support students with different needs, teachers can change:Ìý

  • the content being taughtÌýÌý
  • the process used to teachÌýÌý
  • the product students createÌýÌý
  • the environment where learning takes place

Adjusting the content tends to be the most obvious way to support learners. So, teachers who want to engage with differentiated instruction in mixed ability classrooms often find themselves producing a lot of content. This is greatÌýas a way toÌýsupport learners. However, creating new content or leveling existing content is time-consuming, and it can become a real challenge for teachers.ÌýÌý

Content vs process

Instead of adjusting your content, you can use the GSE Teacher Toolkit to adjust your process. When you’re not creating lots of new content, you’ve got more time to consider how to teach new language to your students and how they can show what they’ve learned.ÌýThe GSE Teacher Toolkit helps teachers to focus on the process and language production of learners, rather than the content you are teaching.Ìý

This means less work for you, and more engagement from your students, no matter what their level is. And the GSE Teacher Toolkit can help you understand the skills we can expect students to demonstrate. So how does this work in practice? Let’sÌýtake a look.Ìý

Differentiated instruction in practice

Let's apply differentiated instruction, using the , to a complicated grammar lesson for a mixed classroom where some students are still A2, most are A2+ and a few are emerging B1.

Once you have the content for your students, it’s time to think about how to differentiate the lesson.Ìý

One option would be to create two new worksheets, at an A2 level and an A2+ level - but as noted above, it’s a lot of work. Additionally, creating leveled worksheets means that you mayÌýactually beÌýpreventing your students from making progress by not adding enough challenge.Ìý

To differentiate appropriately, it’s best to focus on the process that students will use, in this case, editing. In the GSE Teacher Toolkit, this kind of editing is an A2+ level skill. So, the A2+ and B1 students should be able to complete this worksheet.Ìý

However, it might be a bit challenging for the A2 students. Therefore, you can look in the GSE Teacher Toolkit to find what writing skills you can expect from your A2 students. There are two skills that can be used to process this grammar point:Ìý

A snippet of the gse toolkits writing points

Now that you understand the difference in process for students at different levels, it’s time to plan your lesson.Ìý

How to differentiate processÌý

By the end of the lesson all students will be able to identify and correct errors in simple sentences to demonstrate the ability to use 'all of', 'none of', 'most of', 'a lot of', and 'a little of' correctly in writing.Ìý

You can adjust the process to support students at all levels of ability.Ìý

Lesson procedure for the worksheet  How the process is differentiated to support all learners 
 1. Ask all students to read the crossed-out errors in the worksheet and underline specific mistakes.   This supports A2 students the most. However, it's useful for all students.  
 2. Ask students in groups to discuss the mistakes. A2+ and B1 students will guide a discussion to create a series of "rules" to correct the mistakes in highlights.   This will be the most useful to A2+/B1 students while challenging your A2 students. Using groupwork allows more skilled students to support their peers.  
 3. All students will submit their grammar rules as group work.   This allows A2+/B1 students to help A2 students express grammar rules in their own words, to help improve understanding and use.  
 4. When finished all students complete the worksheet.    All students from A2/B1 can now complete the worksheet.  
 5. After completing the worksheet, all students will be asked to highlight the correction in the new sentences.   Completing the worksheet may have been easier for your A2+/B1 students.  
6. Finally, all students will write a new sentence using the target language. Each student chooses one student to collaborate with.   Adding this extra step ensures that all students make progress by asking them to transfer their knowledge and demonstrate learning by creating something new.  
7. Partners review each other’s sentences and underline any errors in the use of quantifiers. Partners can point out the rules that need to be applied and do a final review once changes have been made.   Applying the grammar rules that learners created to the new sentences helps to fully internalize the language of the lesson for all of your students at every level.  
8. Students review peer corrections and create final sentences to submit to the teacher. Students submit all work, including original worksheet, sentences submitted to peers, peer-reviewed sentences with underlines and rule guidance and final correct sentences.   Now, all students from A2/B1 have had an opportunity to understand the rules, clarify and demonstrate knowledge of the grammar point.   

This differentiated process primarily supports the students whose level is slightly lower. However, all students will benefit from the change in process, which gives them a chance to deepen their understanding of the grammar rules.Ìý

And, as you can see, students write rules, create new sentences, and conduct a peer review.ÌýAll ofÌýthis work is created and completed by the students.

As the teacher, you don’t need to create a new worksheet to teach a differentiated class. The GSE Teacher Toolkit can help you to find a solution that creates more work for students and less work for the teacher.Ìý

Learn moreÌý

If you are interested in differentiated instruction,ÌýtÌýI recommend is thoroughly researched and detailed byÌý.Ìý

For more uses of the , there is a wholeÌýsectionÌýdedicated to GSEÌýon ourÌýblog where you’ll find articles on how to use the toolkit. If you need to teachÌýgrammarÌýandÌývocabulary, the GSE Teacher Toolkit is there to support you.Ìý

Read our posts 'Grammar lesson planning with the GSE Teacher Toolkit' and 'Assessing listening skills with the GSE'.

Explore our GSE resources

More blogs from ɫèAV

  • A group of university students sat on the stone steps of a university campus

    From experience to innovation: How PTE Academic helped shape ɫèAV English Express Test

    By
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    When we launched the ɫèAV English Express Test, it’s true - we were not starting from scratch. We were building on years of experience, research, and innovation from PTE Academic, our globally recognised, high-stakes English test trusted by thousands of institutions.

    ɫèAV English Express Test may be new, but it is backed by everything we have learned from delivering millions of secure, accurate, and trusted assessments around the world.

    A legacy of trustÌý

    PTE Academic has been setting the standard for English language testing since 2009. It is known for its AI-powered scoring, robust security, and global recognition. Over the years, we have refined every part of the testing journey, from how we assess speaking and writing, to how we protect against fraud and ensure fairness.

    That legacy gave us a strong foundation to build something new. With ɫèAV English Express Test, we took the best of what we know and reimagined it for a different kind of test taker, one who needs speed, flexibility, and simplicity, without compromising on quality.

    What we carried forward

    ɫèAV English Express Test uses the same AI scoring technology that powers PTE Academic, trained on over 147,000 responses and verified by human experts. 

    This ensures that every score is consistent, fair, and accurate, no matter where or when the test is taken. We also brought our deep understanding of test security into the design of ɫèAV English Express Test. From dual-camera proctoring to biometric voice verification, every layer of the test is built to protect integrity and build trust. 

    And just like PTE Academic, ɫèAV English Express Test is aligned to the Global Scale of English and mapped to CEFR levels, so institutions can set score requirements with confidence. 

    Designed for a new generation of learners

    While PTE Academic is ideal for students applying globally, ɫèAV English Express Test is purpose-built for learners with their sights set on the United States. It is still faster, fairer and simple, all at a great price, without losing the rigour that institutions expect.

    Students can take the test from home, receive results in minutes, and get certified scores within 48 hours. That kind of accessibility is a game-changer, especially for students in remote regions.

    Why this matters for institutions

    By accepting ɫèAV English Express Test, institutions are not just offering another test option. They are offering a test backed by years of proven success. They are giving students a faster, more flexible way to apply, while maintaining the standards that support academic success.

    And for institutions already familiar with PTE Academic, ɫèAV English Express Test is a natural extension, one that complements your admissions toolkit and helps you reach more students, more easily.

    Experience you can trust

    At ɫèAV, we believe that innovation should be grounded in experience. That is why ɫèAV English Express Test is not just a new test. It is the next step in our mission to make English testing more accessible, more secure, and more student-friendly.

    Because when we combine what we have learned with what students need today, we create something truly powerful.Ìý

  • A girl sat at a laptop with headphones on in a library

    5 myths about online language learning

    By Steffanie Zazulak
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    Technology has radically changed the way people are able to access information and learn. As a result, there are a great number of tools to facilitate online language learning – an area that’s been the subject of many myths. Here we highlight (and debunk) some of the bigger ones…

    Myth #1: You will learn more quickly

    Although online learning tools are designed to provide ways to teach and support the learner, they won’t provide you with a shortcut to proficiency or bypass any of the key stages of learning.ÌýAlthough you may well be absorbing lots of vocabulary and grammar rules while studying in isolation, this isn’t a replacement for an environment in which you can immerse yourself in the language with English speakers. Such settings help you improve your speaking and listening skills and increase precision, because the key is to find opportunities to practise both – widening your use of the language rather than simply building up your knowledge of it.

    Myth #2: It replaces learning in the classroom

    With big data and AI increasingly providing a more accurate idea of their level, as well as a quantifiable idea of how much they need to learn to advance to the next level of proficiency, classroom learning is vital for supplementing classroom learning. And with the Global Scale of English providing an accurate measurement of progress, students can personalise their learning and decide how they’re going to divide their time between classroom learning and private study.

    Myth #3: It can’t be incorporated into classroom learning

    There are a huge number of ways that students and teachers can use the Internet in the classroom. Meanwhile, ɫèAV’s online courses and apps have a positive, measurable impact on your learning outcomes.

    Myth #4:ÌýYou can't learn in the workplace

    Online language learning is ideally suited to the workplace and we must create the need to use the language and opportunities to practise it. A job offers one of the most effective learning environments: where communication is key and you’re frequently exposed to specialized vocabulary. Online language learning tools can flexibly support your busy schedule.

    Myth #5: Online language learning is impersonal and isolating

    A common misconception is that online language learning is a solitary journey, lacking the personal connection and support found in traditional classrooms. In reality, today’s digital platforms are designed to foster community and real interaction. With features like live virtual classrooms, discussion forums and instant feedback, learners can connect with peers and educators around the world, building skills together.

  • Woman on a laptop working focused in her office

    Helping students succeed with ɫèAV English Express Test

    By
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    When a student applies to university, they are not just submitting a form. They are sharing their potential. And when institutions review those applications, they need to be confident that the tools they use, especially English proficiency tests, are giving them a clear, accurate picture of that student’s readiness.

    That is why accuracy matters. It is not just about getting a number. For us, it is about setting students up for success and helping institutions make decisions they can stand behind.

    Getting it right from the start

    The ɫèAV English Express Test was designed to be fast and flexible, but never at the expense of accuracy. No – this was a top priority. Students can take it from anywhere, at any time, and receive results in minutes. But behind that speed is a powerful scoring engine that ensures every result is fair, consistent, and reliable.

    ɫèAV English Express Test uses AI trained on over 147,000 responses, with a 0.98 correlation to human scoring. That means institutions can trust that the scores reflect real ability. And every test is reviewed by a human expert before certification, adding another layer of quality control. Add to this that admissions teams can review written and spoken samples – it really is a multi-faceted approach to the reliability of scores.

    Why accuracy supports academic success

    When students are placed in the right programs based on accurate scores, they are more likely to thrive. They can keep up with lectures, contribute to discussions, and complete assignments with confidence. That leads to better outcomes, higher retention, and a more positive student experience.

    On the other hand, if a student is placed when their scores are not representative of their skills, it can lead to frustration, poor performance, or even dropout. That is why accurate scoring is not just a technical detail, it really is a foundation for student success.

    What this means for institutions

    For admissions teams, accurate scoring means fewer surprises. It means being able to confidently admit students who are ready to succeed. And it means fewer resources spent on support for students who were not quite prepared.

    It also supports your institution’s reputation. When students succeed, they become advocates. They share their stories, recommend your programs, and contribute to a thriving academic community.

    A commitment to quality – Across the board

    While ɫèAV English Express Test is ideal for students who need a fast, flexible option, ɫèAV also offers PTE Academic, both of which support U.S. study applications.Ìý

    Together, ɫèAV English Express Test and PTE Academic offer a complete solution, one that supports students at every stage of their journey and helps institutions make decisions with confidence.