These types of questions assess a student’s metacognition or critical thinking:
- Which character is most important to the story?
- Why?
- Do you agree or disagree with the character’s actions?
- Why or why not?
The clear separation of language and critical thinking in assessment will help you to get a measure of each student’s progress in both skills.
Informal assessment
What about those informal assessments? It can be harder to delineate critical thinking and language skills clearly in an on-the-spot assessment.
For example, if you’ve assigned group work, consider keeping a checklist of how students interact with one another. Some checklist items can be:
- Who made an inference?
- Who supplied reasoning for another student’s idea?
- Who made a comparison?
- Who drew a conclusion?
You can also ask your students to keep a checklist and post these questions on an electronic bulletin board. Like self-assessment, these peer-to-peer assessments can get students reflecting and noticing.
Rubrics can also be useful in informal assessment. Let’s say you’ve asked students to prepare or write an essay. To measure critical thinking, you can look at each student’s ideation process when they’ve been working on their essays:
- Is a student looking at all possible topics?
- What are the factors that make a student select the option they did?
- Are they demonstrating an awareness of other ideas?
The answers to these questions will tell you whether or not your students are thinking critically.
Just like with any other skills, the assessment of critical thinking needs to happen both formally and informally. We need to consider both the process and the final product. And in doing so, we need to carefully design rubrics that differentiate language skills and metacognition.